Who is eligible for bolsa familia

Podcasts Check the box below to find out about our latest podcast episodes featuring interviews and discussions with experts and practitioners from the field of social protection. Helena St. Area of work. Yes, I will answer. No, thanks. Comments: The nine transfers will be paid independently of the month in which the women has been identified by the programme as pregnant.

The pregnant benefit is compatible with the adolescent benefit for pregnant adolescents. This benefit, which was first targeted to households with children between 0 and 6 years old through Brasil Carinhoso , was widened in to all the beneficiaries households even if they do not have children.

Monitoring is case by case and depends on the type of failure:, vulnerabilities and strengths of targeted households to implement a monitoring plan. Mode of transfer: Delivery of cash and food complements Iron and A vitamin Periodicity of delivery: Monthly Maximum per household: One benefit per family Description: This component seeks to extend health and nutrition coverage for children under 6 years and to improve access to nurseries.

Date: Publication info: International Monetary Fund. Working Paper No. Paiva, L. Date: Publication info: Economia e Sociedade, Campinas, v.

Date: Publication info: Protection, production, promotion: Exploring synergies between social protection and rural productive development in Latin America, chapter 2, J. Gilligan, D. Vaitsman and R. Paes-Sousa coords. Canella, L. Monteiro Date: Publication info: Rev. Author: Silva, A.

Date: Publication info: Cad. Author: Ruscheinsky, A. Author: Carvalho, A. Almeida, E. Nilson, J. Ubarana, I. Yuka Yuba, and D. The IGD is calculated as the sum of scores for each of these areas, with each dimension representing 25 percent of the index value.

All the actors, including the federal, state and local governments, the monitoring agency, other government agencies, such as the General Controller's Office and the Office of the Public Prosecutor, executed their roles effectively and shared a common interest in making the PBF work. Initially, some federal states continued to have their own CCT programmes, which meant that there was a risk of potential duplication.

To solve this problem, sub-national programmes were merged into the PBF via joint cooperation agreements between the federal government and the individual states. This case study has been assessed using the Public Impact Fundamentals, a simple framework and practical too to help you assess your public policies and ensure the three fundamentals - Legitimacy, Policay and Action are embedded in them.

Learn more about the Fundamentals and how you can use them to access your own policies and initiatives. Home - Centre for public impact. Contact us Menu. Our Vision for Government Building on our previous research around shared power, legitimacy, and experimentation, we present an emerging vision for the future of government.

Innovation in the Face of Crisis Insights from European cities' rapid and creative reactions to the pandemic. The Shared Power Principle Think what could happen if governments shared power to create positive outcomes for people? Finding Legitimacy Understanding what building and maintaining legitimacy means today.

Public Impact Fundamentals Discover how you can achieve public impact using a tried and tested, simple framework. More reports Read all our reports that explore we can shape a new future for government. Blog Read how leaders are transforming lives and achieving public impact through these honest and personal reflections.

Case Studies Examples of public policy succeeding or failing, drawing out the key lessons for future policy work. Partnering for Learning Projects and research conducted with other government changemakers in our global network.

Human Learning Systems Working with the Human Learning Systems collaborative to reveal a radical new approach to public service for the real world. Learning to Listen Again Working with Changing Lives to understand how government could be listening more inclusively.

Engaging the Public on Climate Change We believe individuals and communities should be at the heart of shaping a place-based transition to net-zero by Building more generative relationships around regulation in the UK Working with Easier Inc to co-create spaces for building generative relationships around regulation.

Built for All Working with Mastercard Center for Inclusive Growth to create a global framework for building inclusive economies. What we do What we do, how we work, who and where we are. Join our team Come reimagine government - explore our current vacancies. More Reports Read all our reports that explore we can shape a new future for government. Blog Read how leaders are transforming lives and achieving public impact. Partnering for impact Projects and research conducted with other government changemakers in our global network.

About Us What we do What we do, how we work, who and where we are. Go back. In the late s and early s high levels of hunger, poverty and inequality characterised urban life in many, and particularly the densely populated, cities in Brazil. Under PBF low-income families receive cash transfers on the condition that they, for example, send their children to school and ensure they are properly vaccinated. The conditional cash transfer model successfully reduced levels of inequality and hunger — with significantly fewer people living below the poverty line — and closing the historical rural-urban gap.

In the Transparency Portal , it is also possible to find, sorting by the municipality, the name of the beneficiary, social security identification number, and the benefit value. In addition to those, there is an extra-official public application through which some of these data can be accessed: the BolsaFamilia. Given the above, several questions can be raised about the legal basis and the proportionality of the exposure to which beneficiaries of the PBF are subjected.

The decree that regulates it provides that the Social Control Council must have access to PBF data and information and also that the list of beneficiaries of the PBF should be widely disclosed by the Municipal and Federal District governments.

The Access to Information Act is, furthermore, another instrument that, in terms of active transparency, establishes that information of public interest must be disclosed regardless of requests art. It also determines that personal information can be released by the government, when consented art. These measures, although legal, are under possible tension with the General Data Protection Act enacted in , coming into force later this year , exceed the specific obligations established in the Access to Information Act, and fail to meet requirements of necessity and proportionality.

After all, a broad disclosure of these data involves risks already materialised. Last year, a scam spread through Whatsapp messages installed viruses on devices of beneficiaries, by offering a link that promised an additional benefit , the 13th month-pay. Something similar occurred in During the last presidential elections, it was found out that a candidate was sending propaganda directed specifically to the program beneficiaries, by WhatsApp as well.

Although the management of PBF involves several agencies at different levels of the federation, its functioning provides generous sharing and control strategies, which calls into question the necessity for a frequent, active and general disclosure of this information to the public. The study is still in the research and writing phase. Some alerts are already in place, however.

Advances in technology and the increased data processing capabilities allow for more constant collection, validation, and sharing of information among government bodies. The accounts from our interviewees also point to an expectation of efficiency increase, and the improvement in the focalization of the policy — which, although frequently questioned, is an essential feature of PBF since its inception.

Especially in the face of the imminent coming to force of the Brazilian General Data Protection Act, we seek to address some of the eventual systemic problems that may arise in such a context.

For instance, the excessive data collection; the opacity of systems and infrastructure; the lack of openness, inclusiveness, and transparency in the decision-making process; flawed accountability mechanisms and security. The latter is exacerbated by the number of agents and bodies processing these data be it to render services, to implement policies, or to inspect activities , by inadequate data protection safeguards, and the vulnerable position in which beneficiaries encounter themselves.

Issues about data sharing and its use for non-specific, unforeseen and uninformed purposes also arise, such as we have discussed at the time of publication of the Decree on the Base Registry.